One area that the IRS seems to find common ground between
racehorses
and
show horses is the deductibility of advertising costs. Some
of my clients have engaged in unconventional advertising, which is
perfectly permissible, and in fact can produce results. A
taxpayer, for instance, may pay for loudspeaker announcements and
printed announcements at shows that announce the name of the
taxpayers company or firm, or the sponsorship of a particular
race. The costs of such advertising appear on the books and
records of the taxpayers company rather than being an expense of
the horse activity. As a result, the costs are shifted away
from the horse activity, thus helping reduce the costs of the
horse activity.
The Tax Court ruled in favor of a restaurant
company, which deducted advertising expenses, paid towards
exhibiting show horses and dogs; the taxpayer claimed that profits
were associated with these advertising costs. [Rodgers Dairy
Co. (l950) l4 TC 66.] In that case the taxpayer sought to
deduct costs of maintenance, training and transportation of show
horses, as well as depreciation of these horses and the costs of
two Russian wolfhounds. The horses were exhibited in the
name of the restaurant company in 24 shows, primarily within a
radius of 30 miles from headquarters, but many of the shows were
at remote places unlikely to attract customers. The horses
were shown with the same blue and white color scheme that the
restaurant used on its storefronts and on trucks. The
company’s initials were painted on the equipment vehicles; signs
were displayed in front of the stables disclosing that the
corporation owned the horses; catalogs in which the corporation
was listed as owner of the horses, were distributed at each horse
show. The horses won numerous ribbons and cups that were
displayed on the walls of the corporate offices. A
professional trainer was hired. The owner only rode the horses
when the trainer was not available to ride. Some of the
horses were sold at substantial profits. Stud fees were collected
and attributed to advertising.
However, unless the taxpayer shows a direct
connection between the advertising of horses and the promotion of
a separate business, the expenses may not be deductible.
There should be evidence that the expenses are undertaken
primarily for a business and not a social or personal purpose, and
that there is approximate, rather than merely a remote or
incidental, relationship between the expenditures and the
taxpayers business. This is essentially a question of fact.
There is no hard and fast rule as to what constitutes a proximate
connection between an activity such as sponsorship of horses in
horse shows and establishing new customers. More is needed to
withstand IRS scrutiny than a showing that the activity affords
opportunities to meet people who in turn might want to become
clients now or in the future. The fact that the taxpayer has
in fact garnered new customers in virtue of the advertising
suggests a direct nexus. There is no specific procedure or
means for proving a direct nexus, but good record-keeping that
shows how new customers were referred is likely to be sufficient.
A taxpayer-owner of a lock and safe company
who maintained four Mardi Gras parade horses that participated in
about five parades per year, and sought to deduct these expenses
as advertising costs, failed to convince the Tax Court, apparently
because there was no actual promotion of his name or business in
connection with the use of the horses in parades. [Lucien
Rolland (l959) TC Memo 59-l6l] The taxpayer testified that
his expenditures were made for a business purpose, but the Court
was not persuaded, apparently because: (l) The taxpayers
business was not benefited merely by entering the horses into the
various parades; (2) There was no showing that there was any
advertising material used in connection with the parades which
would publicize the business; (3) There was no showing that the
activities directly advertised the taxpayers business.
Rather, the taxpayer claimed that he expected to derive a business
benefit through mixing with people and making contacts with
customers and prospective customers. While the mere fact of
membership in social and other organizations is helpful in
providing contacts and obtaining clients—this in itself is not
sufficient to justify deduction of expenses in connection
therewith as ordinary and necessary business expenses.
Advertising expenses include institutional or
good will advertising. This refers to any type of goodwill
advertising that keeps the taxpayers name before the public.
To be deductible, the expenses must relate to the patronage that
the taxpayer expects in the future. Thus, utilizing horses,
whether race horses or show horses, can be a bona fide method to
publicize ones business, and the taxpayer should take care to
document how the activity is reasonably calculated to gain
publicity for the company, or to help distinguish the company from
its competitors. Merely showing a connection between the
taxpayers name or business name, and the sponsorship of horse
events, is not, in itself, likely to be enough evidence to support
an advertising deduction for horse racing or horse shows.
Promotional activities may also include
deductions for entertainment expenses. Sometimes
entertainment expenses overlap with advertising and promotional
expenses in that a given promotional activity can function both as
a means of advertising and as a means of entertaining business
clients. As a general rule, entertainment and meal expense
are deductible if they are ordinary and necessary expenses
incurred in the operation of a business of the taxpayer and are
directly related to or associate with business or the production
of income. Meal, transportation and entertainment expenses
must be proven by clear and accurate records as required under
Section 274 of the Code. If done properly, entertaining of
prospective customers at weekend trips to the races qualify.
There should be substantiation showing that
the expenditure were tied to or motivated by the intent to secure
a business advantage.